Magnets for Pain: What You Need to Know
Explore the science behind magnetic therapy for pain relief and learn what research reveals.
Understanding Magnetic Therapy for Pain Relief
Magnetic therapy is a complementary health approach that involves using magnetic fields or magnets placed on or near the body to alleviate pain or promote healing. This practice has gained popularity in recent decades, with magnets incorporated into various consumer products including wristbands, jewelry, mattresses, clothing, and therapeutic pads. Despite widespread marketing claims about pain relief benefits, the scientific evidence surrounding magnetic therapy remains complex and often contradictory. Understanding the distinction between different types of magnetic therapy, the current state of research, and FDA approval status is essential for making informed health decisions.
Types of Magnetic Therapy
Magnetic therapy encompasses several distinct approaches, each with different mechanisms of action and varying levels of scientific support. The two primary categories are static magnetic therapy and electromagnetic therapy, with additional specialized applications approved by regulatory agencies.
Static Magnetic Therapy
Static magnetic therapy involves placing permanent magnets directly on or near the body for extended periods. This approach is the most commonly marketed form of magnetic therapy and is incorporated into numerous consumer products sold over-the-counter. Static magnets remain in one position and deliver a constant magnetic field to the targeted area. Practitioners and manufacturers claim that this constant magnetic field can reduce inflammation, improve circulation, and alleviate various types of pain. However, the strength of these magnets varies considerably across different products, which may contribute to inconsistent research findings.
Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy (PEMF)
Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy represents a different approach to magnetic treatment. This therapy uses an electric current passing through a wire coil containing magnetic material to generate pulsing electromagnetic fields. Unlike static magnets, PEMF therapy delivers variable magnetic fields that change over time. The FDA has approved specific applications of PEMF therapy for certain medical conditions, marking it as a more clinically validated approach compared to static magnetic therapy.
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)
Transcranial magnetic stimulation is a specialized form of magnetic therapy that uses magnetic fields to stimulate brain cells. This therapy requires professional administration and has received FDA approval for specific neurological and psychiatric conditions. TMS represents the most scientifically supported form of magnetic therapy, with rigorous clinical trials demonstrating efficacy for approved indications.
FDA Approval Status for Magnetic Therapy
The FDA’s regulatory stance distinguishes between different types of magnetic therapy, approving some while finding insufficient evidence for others. Understanding this distinction is crucial for consumers evaluating magnetic therapy options.
FDA-Approved Magnetic Therapies
The FDA has approved pulsed electromagnetic field therapy for specific medical conditions. Approved uses include treatment of fractures that do not heal with standard medical treatment and post-operative pain and edema (swelling) in superficial soft tissues. These FDA approvals indicate that, in these specific clinical contexts, electromagnetic therapy has demonstrated sufficient efficacy and safety to warrant regulatory approval. Additionally, transcranial magnetic stimulation has received FDA approval for severe migraines, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and depression. For these conditions, magnetic therapy is considered conventional medicine rather than complementary therapy.
Non-Approved Static Magnetic Therapy
Despite widespread marketing and consumer availability, static magnetic therapy has not received FDA approval for any pain-related indication. The FDA maintains that scientific evidence does not support the efficacy of static magnets for pain relief, and these devices remain unregulated for therapeutic pain-relief claims. While static magnets are sold as consumer products, they are not classified as medical devices approved for treating pain conditions.
Research Evidence on Magnetic Therapy for Pain
Scientific research on magnetic therapy presents a nuanced picture, with findings varying significantly depending on the type of therapy, the specific pain condition studied, and the quality of the research methodology.
Electromagnetic Therapy for Musculoskeletal Pain
A comprehensive 2020 review examining 21 studies involving 1,101 participants focused on electromagnetic therapy for musculoskeletal pain conditions. This review reported that electromagnetic therapy reduced pain and improved function in people with various musculoskeletal diseases. The conditions studied included knee osteoarthritis (8 studies), shoulder impingement syndrome (2 studies), chronic mechanical neck pain (1 study), low-back pain (4 studies), fibromyalgia (3 studies), patellofemoral knee pain (1 study), plantar fasciitis or heel pain (1 study), and hand osteoarthritis (1 study). These findings suggest that electromagnetic therapy may offer some benefit for specific musculoskeletal conditions, though the strength of evidence varies across different pain types.
Static Magnet Therapy for General Pain
Research on static magnet therapy for pain relief shows more limited and inconsistent results. A 2021 review of 7 studies involving 576 participants examined the use of static magnets for various types of pain, including diabetic neuropathy, sciatica, fibromyalgia, plantar heel pain, pelvic pain, neck and shoulder pain, and forearm and wrist pain. The results were mixed, with four studies showing improvements in pain and three showing no benefit. Researchers attributed these inconsistencies to different static magnet strengths and varying dosing times across studies, making it difficult to determine optimal treatment parameters.
Magnetic Therapy for Osteoarthritis
Research on magnetic therapy for osteoarthritis pain demonstrates differential effectiveness depending on the therapy type and location of pain. A 2018 review of 12 studies involving 385 participants examined electromagnetic therapy for osteoarthritis in various body areas including knees (10 studies), neck (2 studies), and hands (1 study). The findings indicated that electromagnetic therapy reduced pain and improved function in people with knee and hand osteoarthritis but not neck osteoarthritis. Interestingly, shorter sessions lasting less than 30 minutes proved more effective than longer sessions. In contrast, there is no conclusive evidence that static magnet therapy is beneficial for osteoarthritis pain, according to current research summaries.
Fibromyalgia Pain Management
The evidence on magnetic therapy for fibromyalgia remains very limited and weak. A 2021 narrative review of four studies involving 312 participants examined both electromagnetic and static magnet therapy for fibromyalgia. The review concluded that there is not enough evidence to determine if magnetic therapy is helpful for reducing pain in people with fibromyalgia. However, two of the smaller studies (involving 93 participants combined) found evidence of pain reduction using 30 minutes of electromagnetic therapy administered two to three times per week for 3 to 4 weeks, suggesting that certain protocols may warrant further investigation.
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS)
Research on magnetic therapy for complex regional pain syndrome presents mixed findings. A 2021 review of 2 studies involving 70 participants examined PEMF therapy for people with CRPS. One study found that PEMF did not reduce pain or swelling, while another smaller study found that people with CRPS experienced less pain and improved function in their upper and lower limbs after 10 consecutive days of bio-electro-magnetic-energy-regulation (BEMER) therapy, a specific type of PEMF treatment. Currently, no recent research is available on static magnet therapy for CRPS.
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Pain
Limited research exists on magnetic therapy for carpal tunnel syndrome pain. No recent research is available on electromagnetic therapy for this condition. For static magnet therapy, a small 2018 study involving 22 participants concluded that 6 weeks of static magnets did not reduce pain significantly in people with carpal tunnel syndrome, suggesting that this approach may not be effective for this particular condition.
Multiple Sclerosis and Paresthesia Pain
One small 2016 study involving 63 participants examined electromagnetic therapy for multiple sclerosis-related paresthesia pain, characterized by abnormal itching, prickling, tingling, burning, or numbness in the limbs. The study found that 60 days of twice-weekly PEMF therapy for 20 minutes per session was effective in reducing pain in people with multiple sclerosis. Additionally, a smaller reduction in pain was observed after 30 days of PEMF treatment, suggesting that even shortened treatment durations may provide some benefit.
Safety Considerations for Magnetic Therapy
Both static and electromagnetic therapy appear to be safe options for treating pain when used appropriately. Many studies have reported minimal or no negative side effects in people following magnetic therapy, including individuals with chronic diseases and pain conditions. Most users tolerate these therapies well without experiencing adverse reactions.
Special Populations and Contraindications
While generally safe, magnets may not be safe for certain individuals. People who use pacemakers or other implanted electronic devices should avoid magnetic therapy, as magnets can interfere with these devices’ proper functioning. Additionally, individuals with insulin pumps or other electronic medical implants should consult their healthcare providers before using magnetic therapy.
Pediatric Safety
Magnets and magnetic therapy devices should be kept out of reach of children. Small magnets pose a serious hazard, as children may swallow or accidentally inhale them, which can result in serious internal injuries or be potentially deadly. Parents and caregivers should store magnetic therapy products securely to prevent accidental ingestion.
Practical Recommendations
Given the current state of scientific evidence and regulatory approval status, several important recommendations emerge for consumers considering magnetic therapy:
- Do not use static magnets or any unproven health practice to replace conventional medical care or to postpone seeing a healthcare provider about pain or any other medical problem.
- If considering magnetic therapy, inform all healthcare providers about any complementary or integrative health approaches you plan to use.
- For FDA-approved magnetic therapies such as PEMF for non-healing fractures or transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression, consult qualified healthcare professionals who specialize in these treatments.
- Be aware that consumer magnetic products marketed for pain relief lack scientific support and FDA approval for pain-related claims.
- Ensure that magnetic therapy devices are kept away from children to prevent accidental ingestion.
Comparing Static Magnets and Electromagnetic Therapy
Understanding the differences between static and electromagnetic therapy can help consumers make informed decisions about which approach, if any, might be appropriate to discuss with their healthcare providers.
| Characteristic | Static Magnet Therapy | Electromagnetic Therapy (PEMF) |
|---|---|---|
| How It Works | Permanent magnets placed on or near the body deliver constant magnetic field | Electric current through wire coil generates pulsing magnetic fields |
| FDA Approval Status | No FDA approval for pain relief | FDA approved for specific conditions (non-healing fractures, post-operative pain) |
| Research Evidence | Mixed and inconsistent results; no conclusive evidence for pain relief | Stronger evidence for certain conditions, particularly musculoskeletal pain |
| Available Products | Wristbands, jewelry, mattresses, clothing, patches | Professional medical devices used in clinical settings |
| Regulatory Status | Not regulated as medical devices for pain claims | Regulated as medical devices when FDA approved |
| Cost | Generally inexpensive; widely available over-the-counter | More expensive; typically requires professional administration |
Frequently Asked Questions About Magnetic Therapy
Q: Are static magnets effective for treating chronic pain?
A: Scientific evidence does not conclusively support the use of static magnets for chronic pain relief. While some studies show mixed results, the majority of well-designed research indicates that static magnets are not effective for chronic pain conditions including osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.
Q: Has the FDA approved any magnetic therapy for pain?
A: The FDA has approved pulsed electromagnetic field therapy for treating non-healing fractures and post-operative pain and swelling in superficial soft tissues. However, static magnet therapy remains unapproved for any pain-related indication. Transcranial magnetic stimulation is FDA-approved for treating severe migraines, depression, and obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Q: Can I use magnetic therapy instead of seeing my doctor?
A: No. You should not use magnets or any unproven health practice to replace conventional medical treatment or to postpone seeing a healthcare provider. Magnetic therapy should only be considered as a complementary approach alongside conventional medical care, and only after consulting with your healthcare provider.
Q: Is magnetic therapy safe for people with pacemakers?
A: No. People with pacemakers or other implanted electronic medical devices should not use magnetic therapy, as magnets can interfere with the proper functioning of these devices. Always consult your healthcare provider before using any magnetic therapy if you have an implanted device.
Q: Which type of pain might benefit most from electromagnetic therapy?
A: Research suggests that electromagnetic therapy shows the most promise for musculoskeletal conditions, particularly knee osteoarthritis, hand osteoarthritis, shoulder impingement syndrome, and low-back pain. Results are less consistent for other pain conditions such as fibromyalgia.
Q: How long should magnetic therapy sessions last?
A: Research indicates that for electromagnetic therapy, shorter sessions lasting less than 30 minutes tend to be more effective than longer sessions. However, optimal treatment duration may vary depending on the specific condition and therapy type. Consult with a healthcare provider for personalized recommendations.
Q: Are there any side effects from magnetic therapy?
A: Both static and electromagnetic therapy appear to be safe, with most studies reporting minimal or no negative side effects. However, certain populations should avoid magnetic therapy, including those with pacemakers, insulin pumps, or other electronic implants. Small magnets should be kept away from children due to the risk of ingestion.
References
- Magnets For Pain: What You Need To Know — National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH), National Institutes of Health. 2024. https://www.nccih.nih.gov/health/magnets-for-pain-what-you-need-to-know
- Magnet Therapy — Merck Manuals Consumer Version. 2024. https://www.merckmanuals.com/home/special-subjects/integrative-complementary-and-alternative-medicine/magnet-therapy
- Bodywork: Can magnets treat pain or other conditions? — Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation. 2024-10-29. https://omrf.org/2024/10/29/bodywork-can-magnets-treat-pain-or-other-conditions/
- Magnets — National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH), U.S. National Institutes of Health. 2015. https://files.nccih.nih.gov/s3fs-public/Magnets_11-18-2015.pdf
- The Effect of Magnetic Therapy on Pain Relief in Postoperation Patients — ClinicalTrials.gov, U.S. National Library of Medicine. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04112745
- Magnet Therapy — EBSCO Research Starters. 2024. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/sports-and-leisure/magnet-therapy
Similar Articles
Read full bio of Sneha Tete
